Hot Dogs Everywhere But On The Track

 

Sky and Sea

Sky and Sea

Minnesotans celebrated the Fourth of July in a variety of ways _ picnics, barbecues, fishing, boating, a leisure day at the lake or in the backyard.

A crowd of  10,245  chose Canterbury Park and it’s free hot dogs, a wiener dog warm-up race and two time-honored stakes races, named for two of the state’s prominent early leaders in thoroughbred racing, Frances Genter and Victor Myers, $60,000 events restricted to Minnesota-bred horses, geldings and fillies.

Six state-bred fillies lined up for the Frances Genter at six furlongs, and a speedster named Sky and Sea got there first by, oh, a furlong or so.

Speed is Life proved it is sometimes a winning factor, too, outdueling eight others in the Victor Myers.

             With Ry Eilkeberry up, Speed is Life used a late surge in the stretch drive to hold off speedster Slippery Ice by a length With Royal Tramp and A P is Loose following up.

            Trainer Doug Oliver saddled the winner for Bob McMahon and Diane Sillik, EZ-AZ Thoroughbreds LLP. Oliver is no stranger to the Victor Myers. He has won it three times now, including the 1995 and 1999 runnings.

            McMahon purchased the horse when it was four or five weeks old. “It had trouble getting on its feet,’’ recalled Sillik. “Why would you want a horse that can’t stand,’’ a bystander wondered.

            Well….how about a record or 4-2-1 with earnings in excess of $60,000.

Sometimes a race  becomes not much more than a showcase for a specific horse,  a venue In which to display his or her wares, to demonstrate that life is not fair in the equine world either.

            …a fair depiction of Friday’s $60,000 Frances Genter Stakes and a resounding win by a 3-year-old filly named Sky and Sea, who on a gorgeous Fourth of July went gate to wire, resembling a mother hen escorting her chicks and winning by 11 ½ lengths.

            That win brought a smile from trainer Bernell Rhone, who has saddled the winner of this race four times, three consecutive now, and rider Dean Butler who was on the Genter winner for a fourth time.

Sky and Sear was 1-5 minutes before post time, a fact that left pressbox professor Jeff Maday a bit perplexed. “I’m surprised someone hasn’t dumped $50,000 on this horse to show,’’ he said. “I figured she’d be 1-9.’’

             A minute later the tote-board numbers clicked and she was exactly that. Moments later she justified that confidence in overwhelming fashion.

            Still, this well-earned and dominant victory did not come wrapped in festive holiday paper, but more in the rumpled, mixed foil of reality.

You’ll hear often in racing about the ups and downs, the tremendous highs and lows the sport can present to those who’ve invested their time, emotion and money.

            It’s not often you’ll encounter both in the same individual as a result of the same race, but that was precisely the case for Scott Rake, the owner/breeder of Sky and Sea.

            Certainly, he was pleased with the magnificent effort from Sky and Sea, but he another filly on his mind afterward, another 3-year-old filly at home in the pasture, a filly who should have been at Canterbury in the same race as her winning stablemate Friday.

            Rebecca Rusch.

“I found myself thinking about her,’’ he said. “She’s a half-sister to Bourbon County. She’s home at our place eating peppermints. I thought Sky and Sea would be the speed in this race and that she could come in as the closer.’’

That was not to be the case.

Rebecca Rusch developed a noncancerous but inoperable tumor on her jaw some time ago. It continues to grow and consequently she was put to pasture.

            Thus, Rake was left with mixed feelings Friday.

            “I had that high and low at the same time,’’ he said.

            by Jim Wells

Advertisements

Comments

  1. I’ve always wondered about the track’s take on a large bridge jumping show bet. Is a negative pool not that big of a deal, or does it create a pretty big downer on the daily handle?

    • It depends on where the wager was made. If there is a negative, or minus, pool on a Canterbury race, each site that has wagered into that pool is responsible for their portion of the shortage. The same would hold true at Canterbury. If a player wagers into a negative pool at a track elsewhere, Canterbury must pay the shortage. That is why we, and many other tracks and ADWs, do not award rewards points or rebates on wagers made into negative pools.
      Definition of a Minus or Negative Pool: A mutuel pool caused when one horse is so heavily played that, after deducting the track take, there is not enough money left to pay the legally prescribed minimum on each winning bet. The racing association has to make up the difference so that all pay-offs are at least the minimum amount, usually $2.10 or $2.20 depending on the local rules.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: